|
Collections / Provenance Research
|
||
![]() |
Provenance Research Project
The findings posted here are limited to the artworks that were known to have transferred ownership during the crucial years of 1932-1946, or that contain gaps in provenance during that time. Artworks that have been "cleared" in the survey are also included. By making this information available to the public, the Minneapolis Institute of Arts is working to fulfill its mission of responsible stewardship of its collections, and to participate in the worldwide effort of identifying works of art looted during World War II. New information will be continuously added to this site, as further research into the collection is completed according to the AAM guidelines. The museum welcomes any information that may further clarify the provenance of artworks in its collection.
Provenance DatabaseBrowse works of art in the collection with complete and ongoing provenance research. Additional Information
Survey Criteria
The recent survey of European paintings and modern sculpture used the following criteria:
Provenance Research Methods
Provenance research is a complex and arduous process, often undertaken by curators or scholars in order to determine the history of ownership of an artwork. It usually involves the physical examination of an artwork for labels or markings, which may indicate the movement of an artwork to another owner or location. In addition, extensive research is often required, utilizing such resources as catalogues raisonnés, photo archives, registrar records, and correspondence from collectors, art dealers, and scholars. Annotated auction catalogues are often a rich source of ownership information, which may occasionally provide biographical information, as are exhibition catalogues. When reviewing such documents, it is necessary to be careful and critical, as gaps in ownership are often encountered. It is not unusual for an artwork to have a long period in its ownership history in which the work is unaccounted for. The attribution of an artwork may change over time, creating confusion in tracking documentation. Other considerations include the possibilities that owners may request anonymity, auction houses or art dealers may not wish to reveal their sources, or important archival resources have been lost or destroyed in natural disasters or wartime. Indeed, being able to establish a full provenance history for a work of art is often the exception. It must be stressed that because an artwork has a gap in its provenance, it does not mean we believe the work was looted.
How to Read Provenance
In writing provenance, the Minneapolis Institute of Arts has used the format suggested by the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C. for ease of readability. The provenance for works of art are listed in chronological order, beginning with the earliest known owner. Life dates, if known, are enclosed in brackets. Dealers, auction houses, or agents are enclosed in parentheses to distinguish from private owners. Relationships between owners and methods of transactions are indicated by punctuation: a semicolon is used to indicate that the work passed directly between two owners (including dealers, auction houses, or agents), and a period is used to separate two owners (including dealers auction houses or agents) if a direct transfer did not occur or is not known to have occurred. Footnotes are used to document or clarify information.
Contact Information
If you have information or wish to inquire about any of the works on the MIA's current list of European paintings, please send an email to Provenance Research, or write to the Provenance Research Project, The Minneapolis Institute of Arts, 2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404. For more information on provenance research in American museums see the American Association of Museums guidelines for Nazi-era provenance.
Suggested Readings
|
|